Seven Pressing Questions for the Boston Celtics Entering 2009-2010

Thursday, September 3, 2009

With Marquis Daniels finally, officially a Celtic, the Celtics look to be almost done (completely done?) wheeling and dealing this summer. Since the roster is almost set, we’re bringing you a list of questions facing the Boston Celtics for the 2009-2010 season. In honor of Marquis’ new number, we’ve decided to make our list seven questions long.

Will Kevin Garnett remain healthy?

You could make a strong argument that, with the Big Ticket on the court rather than in street clothes on the bench, the Boston Celtics would be two-time defending champions. The Celtics are a different team with Garnett on the floor, especially defensively. If he makes a healthy return, it will go a long way towards reestablishing the Celtics as NBA title favorites.

Without KG, the Celtics still have a formidable frontcourt. With him? They could be downright scary.

How quickly will age catch up to the Boston Celtics?

By now, you’ve heard it before – The Celtics are getting old, and it’s their stars who are the old ones. The Big Three plus newcomer Rasheed Wallace are all at least 31, and they all have logged A LOT of minutes. With an improved bench, Doc Rivers should be able to find a lot more rest for his superstars, but they could be on the way down anyways – once players hit a certain amount of minutes played, they tend to hit a wall, and the Celtics’ stars have all played a very substantial amount of minutes (30,526 minutes for Pierce, 39,635 for Garnett, 35,099 for Allen and 34,166 for Wallace – and none of those include the playoffs).

Ray Allen and Paul Pierce both looked bruised and battered by the end of last year’s playoffs. Hopefully, the return of Garnett and the additions of Wallace and Marquis Daniels will take some pressure of Boston’s stars, and they will be energized and fresh entering the playoffs.

Can Rasheed Wallace coexist with Garnett and Perkins?

There are rumors that Wallace is washed up, that he doesn’t have it anymore, that his bad series against Cleveland in round one of the playoffs was a sign that he already has deteriorated. And you know what? I’d say he has. Rasheed is no longer the player he used to be.

But that’s fine for the Celtics. They don’t need ‘Sheed to come in and be a star; all they need is a good defender off the bench and another big man who can spread the floor. If Rasheed can comfortably accept a backup role and settle for being the leader of Boston’s second unit rather than one of the team’s stars, Boston will have a huge upgrade in its frontcourt. But if he sulks about coming off the bench, gets ill-advised technicals during the wrong parts of games and bombs too many threes at the worst possible times? The Celtics could have an aging, 6’11” problem on their hands.

Who will play backup point guard?

Danny Ainge claims the Celtics are happy with their backup point guard position as is. He believes Eddie House and Marquis Daniels are ready to man the position. And I a pinch. But for a whole season, I’d be far happier if the Celtics had a reliable point guard who actually plays the position.

As an aside, don’t forget about Lester Hudson. The 6’3” waterbug out of UT-Martin impresses with his athleticism and defensive intensity and, if he can get comfortable running Doc Rivers’ offense, the Celtics could have a steal on their hands with their lone draft pick.

Can Rajon Rondo take the next step towards stardom?

In the 2009 playoffs, Rondo showed just how close he is to being one of the top point guards in the entire NBA. When he’s going well, there is no point guard in the NBA who combines his defensive ball-hawking, terrific rebounding, great court vision and incredible speed.

Rondo was close to turning the corner last season, and could still improve in leaps and bounds if he improves his consistency and his jumpshot. With his blazing speed, Rajon doesn’t need a deadeye jumpshot like Ray Allen, just a sufficient one to keep defenses from collapsing off him.

How well do Cleveland, LA, and Orlando mesh after their new additions?

I know these are questions about the Boston Celtics, but including their closest competitors makes a lot of sense. The C’s are the only top contender to maintain all its core players (sorry Denver fans, I don’t consider your team true contenders) – all the other contenders made a lot of moves, but the jury is out on how the new starting fives will coexist.

If the Cavs, Lakers or Magic can reacquire the solidarity that made them so tough to play last year, the Celtics might be a step behind their rivals.

How many technical fouls will Boston lead the league by?

With a frontcourt that includes Kendrick Perkins and Rasheed Wallace, the question isn’t whether the Celts will lead the league in technical’s by how much. The addition of the ever-combustible Rasheed Wallace makes the C’s a good bet to be one the highest technical foul-accumulating teams of all-time.

Let’s just hope none of those come with the game, or even the season, on the line.


No response to “Seven Pressing Questions for the Boston Celtics Entering 2009-2010”
Post a Comment | Post Comments (Atom)

Post a Comment